|
Every
summer thousands flock to Las Vegas to play in the world's largest
poker tournament series - the World Series of Poker. Roughly 60 bracelet
events are run over six weeks with constant side satellites,
tournaments and cash games running in the cavernous Rio convention
rooms. It makes for a major logistical challenge each year with all the
various moving parts. Inevitably glitches and errors occur that the
staff try to correct, sometimes unevenly.
What
shouldn't be a major challenge is how the players are communicated with
and treated. The players are the lifeblood of the events as they put up
all the money for events that Caesars profits off. Demanding or not,
their issues should be paramount. Systems for player feedback have been
implemented in the past (e.g. Player Advisory Committee), but after the
latest debacles at the 2012 WSOP (e.g. uneven implementation of a new
forced verbalization of all actions at final tables, the official @WSOP
Twitter account retweeting [*read endorsing] a prominent player, active
critic, and near recent bracelet winner a "the only one who cries all
day every day....a complete bitch") it seems time to revisit some
solid public relations and customer service advice from which the WSOP
could benefit.
Manage Change
- Every year, the WSOP makes adjustments to events offered and rules of
play. I appreciate that people appreciate the familiar and can be
resistant to change, but I firmly believe it's more a matter of
communicating more effectively to your customers. The WSOP established a
player committee to gain feedback, so there is no excuse for new rules
and major changes not to be vetted by the committee first. Secondly, in
today's day and age, the WSOP should have the email address for ever
player who has played before. A detailed email should be sent in advance
of the series that clearly points out any changes to the rules, with a
reasonable explanation for the motivation for the change. Players aren't
stupid. They can see through PR spin. If you are attempting to increase
revenue, state that. If you are trying to increase TV ratings for the
benefit of the WSOP, state that. So many companies fail miserably when
raising prices because they don't give their customers a reasonable
explanation. Explain how you plan to offer more value with your new
revenue. Customers are usually preoccupied with their own lives and
limited perspectives, so sharing information about the context of your
business helps them understand why you are making the changes you are.
Consistency
- One of the greatest strengths that a company can have is consistency
of message, whether it be in their product or their customer service.
Customers are quick to notice inconsistencies in your message. If for
several years you don't want players talking and celebrating, then you
switch around and encourage talk and celebration, it is confusing to
players. Players want to understand your position on the major issues.
They resent the appearance of flippant or punitive changes.
The Voice of Dissent
- Poker players, especially with the relative ease and distance of
Twitter, relish voicing dissent and complaint. Some players are more
vocal and less respectful than others, but if their gripes are
legitimate it is highly dangerous to demonize any dissenting viewpoint.
What people often don't realize is that for every dissenting voice that
chooses to speak up and voice their displeasure, there can by dozens,
hundreds or thousands that share the same perspective but who never make
the effort to speak up. The vocal few may be a pain in your side as
they hurl insults and criticism along with their legitimate grievances,
but it is your task to shield your personal frustration and focus on the
core of their message that affects your product and company. Deal with
the substance of their message, respectfully respond, and urge them to
keep the discourse at a higher level so you can more effectively manage
their issues. The intensity of reaction is usually a result of a
cumulative build up of unaddressed issues.
We All Make Mistakes
- No event as complicated as the WSOP can go off without numerous
errors. When mistakes happen, accept responsibility. Remove your ego.
Apologize quickly. Do your best to explain the context and circumstances
and what you are doing to rectify the situation. Own up to your error
and apologize, don't just make excuses. People have a tremendous
capacity for forgiveness and second chances if they see acceptable signs
of contrition.
*Note
- Monday evening Seth Palansky under his @WSOPRGUY moniker tweeted
"Sorry for the offensive RT/language on @WSOP account. It was wrong
& a bad moment. Love the WSOP & the players. Sorry for damage
done. Going forward the @WSOP account will be managed by @WhoJedi and
@jesswelman." Although a bit belated, it was a positive step in
accepting responsibility and making changes to avoid it happening again
in the future.
Any Attention is Good Attention
- There are some that believe that any attention is good attention if
it gets your company's name out there to a broader audience. I strongly
disagree. I accept that negative attention can often spread more quickly
and wider than carefully crafted positive promotional messages, but
courting any negativity is a big risk. Much like tilt can undermine days
and weeks of steady profitable poker, negative press and customer
reaction can destroy the foundation of a business that has labored for
months or years to establish themselves. Each time we read a new story
of some poker player's mishandling debts or misdeeds in the main press,
it puts a further black eye on the the game amongst casual observers
that negates much of the positive press that is promoted through
traditional channels.
Be Egalitarian
- The goal of your business should be to treat all your customers
equally. The reality is often quite a bit more complex, but signs of
preferential treatment of notable players can quickly undermine the
psychology of the masses of relative no-name players. One of the
greatest qualities of the WSOP is that anyone willing to put up the
buy-in can play an event (assuming it's not capped by size). You can
walk in the halls, or play against the biggest names in poker on a daily
basis. If players see only prominent players' voices heard, it's bad
for business (e.g. quick response to Vanessa Selbst's concern about
women's bathrooms when several other less prominent women players voiced
the concern earlier with no response).
Get with the Times
- I noticed a Twitter comment by ESPN columnist Gary Wise that asserted
that "Aguiar airing his grievance on Twitter instead of going to them
directly was equally unprofessional." I wholeheartedly disagree. As
poker pro Steve O'Dwyer responded, players have approached WSOP
management on multiple occasions only to be rebuffed. The private
approaches have been ineffective. Most of their grievances aren't really
private issues to be resolved behind closed doors as they affect
thousands of other players. By publicly airing their concern via
Twitter, poker players have an expedient manner of gaining feedback on
their issue, allowing for other affected players to weigh in and
collectively have their issue heard.
I
would certainly urge poker players to use a respectful tone and
non-combatative language, but Twitter actually gives a greater voice to
the players that in the past may have not had their issues recognized by
the great poker community. Another poker pro Ben Wilinofsky commented
that Twitter is an appropriate forum to air grievances but just because
the medium was appropriate doesn't mean the message was in that
particular case. The WSOP needs to be more savvy in responding to these
various issues if they hope to quell the tide of dissent. Twitter
removes the veil of ignorance that traditional powers have relied on in
preventing dissent from uniting and collectively venting and seeking
action.
Ultimately,
all these public relations and customer service lessons point towards
the notion that your business is never bigger than your customers. The
World Series of Poker has built the biggest and most successful poker
tournament series in the world, but without respect for their customers
the trends of growth can quickly return in the other direction. If
prominent players are voicing their frustration and urging others not to
play, that's the worst possible type of news because they have many
followers. The WSOP can only prosper long term if they work proactively not
reactively with the players.
*Update Tuesday - I wanted to share a QuadJacks interview with WSOP executive director Ty Stewart where he takes responsibility for the WSOP's errors this year, but also emphasizes that they are trying hard to implement and be consistent with many of the suggestions I made. I liked his suggestion of being more available and transparent. GL
|